CJ Koome’s Security Detail Withdrawn. What’s Going On?
Chief Justice Martha Koome has raised alarm over the withdrawal of her security detail, calling it a threat to judicial independence. Learn more about the implications and reactions from key leaders.
Chief Justice Martha Koome has raised some serious concerns after her security detail was reportedly withdrawn. She called this move a direct threat to the independence of the Judiciary, which is a key pillar of our democracy.
In a letter addressed to Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen and Inspector-General Douglas Kanja, Koome pointed out that the Judiciary’s security isn’t just about her—it’s about ensuring the system functions without intimidation. She described the decision as an attack on the principle of separation of powers.
So, what’s the official explanation? The Inspector-General said the officers were “recalled for training” and that replacements have been assigned. But many within the Judiciary feel this wasn’t communicated clearly, raising eyebrows about the motive.
Political leaders, like Kalonzo Musyoka, have jumped into the conversation, condemning the move. Kalonzo called it unacceptable and emphasized the need to protect judicial independence at all costs.
This situation brings up important questions: How secure is the Judiciary? Are there hidden motives behind decisions like this? And what does it mean for our democracy?
As young Kenyans shaping the future, it’s vital to stay informed about such issues. These decisions affect not just the Judiciary but the kind of governance we want to hold onto.
What’s your take, oversight, coincidence, or something deeper?
Also Read;
What's Your Reaction?
